Dominica vs Sao Tome and Principe: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Dominica
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 454.38 t against 446.65 t in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 7.73 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Dominica has been ahead every year.
Dominica ranks 167th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 168th of 186 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,017 t | 106.07 t | 1,911 t | Dominica |
| 1970s | 1,938 t | 96.54 t | 1,842 t | Dominica |
| 1980s | 1,088 t | 90.33 t | 997.71 t | Dominica |
| 1990s | 1,308 t | 97.73 t | 1,210 t | Dominica |
| 2000s | 701.26 t | 163.08 t | 538.18 t | Dominica |
| 2010s | 627.13 t | 333.31 t | 293.82 t | Dominica |
| 2020s | 550.54 t | 411.26 t | 139.28 t | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Dominica or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Dominica, at 454.38 t against 446.65 t in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Dominica and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 7.73 t, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Dominica ranks 167th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 168th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).