Dominican Republic vs Kyrgyzstan: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Dominican Republic
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 75,789 t against 75,250 t in Dominican Republic, a difference of 539 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 74th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 73rd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 3 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 42,858 t | 48,907 t | 6,050 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 47,854 t | 46,099 t | 1,755 t | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 66,082 t | 62,984 t | 3,097 t | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 76,594 t | 75,078 t | 1,516 t | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Dominican Republic or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 75,789 t against 75,250 t in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Dominican Republic and Kyrgyzstan?
- 539 t, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Dominican Republic ranks 74th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 73rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).