Dominican Republic vs South Sudan: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Dominican Republic
- South Sudan
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 75,250 t against 70,564 t in South Sudan, a difference of 4,686 t.
That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 80th and South Sudan ranks 82nd of 201 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 68,996 t | 62,507 t | 6,489 t | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 76,594 t | 69,159 t | 7,435 t | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Dominican Republic or South Sudan?
- Dominican Republic, at 75,250 t against 70,564 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Dominican Republic and South Sudan?
- 4,686 t, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Dominican Republic and South Sudan rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Dominican Republic ranks 80th and South Sudan ranks 82nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).