Eastern Africa vs Italy: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Eastern Africa
- Italy
How they compare
Eastern Africa currently reports 874,840 t against 502,884 t in Italy, a difference of 371,956 t.
That makes Eastern Africa's figure about 1.7 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Italy ahead.
Eastern Africa ranks 23rd and Italy ranks 22nd of 32 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Eastern Africa averaged higher in 2 and Italy in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Africa | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 207,143 t | 727,383 t | 520,240 t | Italy |
| 1970s | 263,611 t | 818,781 t | 555,170 t | Italy |
| 1980s | 318,880 t | 923,666 t | 604,785 t | Italy |
| 1990s | 380,718 t | 838,405 t | 457,687 t | Italy |
| 2000s | 471,384 t | 672,642 t | 201,258 t | Italy |
| 2010s | 678,326 t | 527,236 t | 151,090 t | Eastern Africa |
| 2020s | 834,423 t | 511,806 t | 322,617 t | Eastern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Eastern Africa or Italy?
- Eastern Africa, at 874,840 t against 502,884 t in Italy as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Eastern Africa and Italy?
- 371,956 t, with Eastern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Africa and Italy?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Africa and Italy rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Eastern Africa ranks 23rd and Italy ranks 22nd of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).