Ecuador vs Peru: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Ecuador
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 171,193 t against 162,936 t in Ecuador, a difference of 8,257 t.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.
Ecuador ranks 47th and Peru ranks 46th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Peru in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 40,397 t | 52,658 t | 12,261 t | Peru |
| 1970s | 60,649 t | 64,068 t | 3,419 t | Peru |
| 1980s | 70,841 t | 72,268 t | 1,426 t | Peru |
| 1990s | 94,791 t | 71,094 t | 23,697 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 129,456 t | 109,777 t | 19,679 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 167,067 t | 159,975 t | 7,092 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 170,097 t | 185,776 t | 15,679 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Ecuador or Peru?
- Peru, at 171,193 t against 162,936 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Ecuador and Peru?
- 8,257 t, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Peru?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Peru rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Ecuador ranks 47th and Peru ranks 46th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).