Ecuador vs Türkiye: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Ecuador
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 184,236 t against 162,936 t in Ecuador, a difference of 21,300 t.
That makes Türkiye's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Türkiye ahead.
Ecuador ranks 47th and Türkiye ranks 44th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Türkiye in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 40,397 t | 82,294 t | 41,897 t | Türkiye |
| 1970s | 60,649 t | 92,989 t | 32,340 t | Türkiye |
| 1980s | 70,841 t | 107,422 t | 36,580 t | Türkiye |
| 1990s | 94,791 t | 126,871 t | 32,080 t | Türkiye |
| 2000s | 129,456 t | 133,275 t | 3,819 t | Türkiye |
| 2010s | 167,067 t | 163,501 t | 3,566 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 170,097 t | 188,956 t | 18,858 t | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Ecuador or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at 184,236 t against 162,936 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Ecuador and Türkiye?
- 21,300 t, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Türkiye?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Türkiye rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Ecuador ranks 47th and Türkiye ranks 44th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).