Egypt vs Guatemala: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Egypt
- Guatemala
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 146,053 t against 127,070 t in Guatemala, a difference of 18,983 t.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.
Egypt ranks 52nd and Guatemala ranks 54th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Guatemala in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 15,067 t | 20,795 t | 5,728 t | Guatemala |
| 1970s | 21,010 t | 34,368 t | 13,358 t | Guatemala |
| 1980s | 37,419 t | 37,332 t | 86.72 t | Egypt |
| 1990s | 51,350 t | 55,430 t | 4,080 t | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 71,849 t | 75,949 t | 4,099 t | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 92,723 t | 123,555 t | 30,833 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 141,232 t | 138,544 t | 2,688 t | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Egypt or Guatemala?
- Egypt, at 146,053 t against 127,070 t in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Egypt and Guatemala?
- 18,983 t, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Guatemala?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Guatemala rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Egypt ranks 52nd and Guatemala ranks 54th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).