El Salvador vs New Zealand: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- El Salvador
- New Zealand
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 27,907 t against 27,472 t in New Zealand, a difference of 435 t.
The two have swapped places 22 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 103rd and New Zealand ranks 104th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 19,884 t | 17,935 t | 1,949 t | El Salvador |
| 1970s | 22,815 t | 23,929 t | 1,114 t | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 18,179 t | 21,154 t | 2,975 t | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 22,972 t | 24,950 t | 1,978 t | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 27,007 t | 28,751 t | 1,744 t | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 28,163 t | 30,488 t | 2,325 t | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 29,228 t | 30,143 t | 914.67 t | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, El Salvador or New Zealand?
- El Salvador, at 27,907 t against 27,472 t in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between El Salvador and New Zealand?
- 435 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and New Zealand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and New Zealand rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- El Salvador ranks 103rd and New Zealand ranks 104th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).