Eritrea vs Gabon: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Eritrea
- Gabon
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 7,535 t against 7,296 t in Eritrea, a difference of 239 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 141st and Gabon ranks 139th of 201 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Gabon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,553 t | 1,993 t | 1,559 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 5,882 t | 3,133 t | 2,749 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 6,995 t | 4,273 t | 2,722 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 7,289 t | 6,005 t | 1,284 t | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Eritrea or Gabon?
- Gabon, at 7,535 t against 7,296 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Eritrea and Gabon?
- 239 t, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Gabon?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Gabon rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Eritrea ranks 141st and Gabon ranks 139th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).