Eritrea vs Guyana: Input — Cropland potassium

Eritrea
7,296 t
in 2023
Guyana
6,639 t
in 2023
Eritrea rank
141st
Guyana rank
144th

Input — Cropland potassium over time

  • Eritrea
  • Guyana
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 7,296 t against 6,639 t in Guyana, a difference of 657 t.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.

Eritrea ranks 141st and Guyana ranks 144th of 201 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Guyana Difference Ahead
1990s 3,553 t 3,005 t 547.5 t Eritrea
2000s 5,882 t 3,378 t 2,504 t Eritrea
2010s 6,995 t 5,345 t 1,650 t Eritrea
2020s 7,289 t 6,433 t 855.62 t Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Eritrea or Guyana?
Eritrea, at 7,296 t against 6,639 t in Guyana as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Eritrea and Guyana?
657 t, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Guyana?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Guyana rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
Eritrea ranks 141st and Guyana ranks 144th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).