Eritrea vs Iceland: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Eritrea
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 7,356 t against 7,296 t in Eritrea, a difference of 60 t.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 129th and Iceland ranks 128th of 186 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,553 t | 8,573 t | 5,020 t | Iceland |
| 2000s | 5,882 t | 7,569 t | 1,687 t | Iceland |
| 2010s | 6,995 t | 8,697 t | 1,701 t | Iceland |
| 2020s | 7,289 t | 8,149 t | 859.39 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Eritrea or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 7,356 t against 7,296 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Eritrea and Iceland?
- 60 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Iceland?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Iceland rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Eritrea ranks 129th and Iceland ranks 128th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).