Eritrea vs Libya: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Eritrea
- Libya
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 7,296 t against 6,862 t in Libya, a difference of 434 t.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Libya ahead.
Eritrea ranks 141st and Libya ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,553 t | 7,347 t | 3,794 t | Libya |
| 2000s | 5,882 t | 6,756 t | 873.63 t | Libya |
| 2010s | 6,995 t | 6,105 t | 890.3 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 7,289 t | 6,292 t | 997.19 t | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Eritrea or Libya?
- Eritrea, at 7,296 t against 6,862 t in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Eritrea and Libya?
- 434 t, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Libya?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Libya rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Eritrea ranks 141st and Libya ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).