Estonia vs Norway: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Estonia
- Norway
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 24,452 t against 23,511 t in Norway, a difference of 941 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 119th and Norway ranks 121st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 41,667 t | 35,426 t | 6,241 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 25,568 t | 30,677 t | 5,109 t | Norway |
| 2010s | 28,051 t | 26,588 t | 1,464 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 27,635 t | 25,431 t | 2,204 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Estonia or Norway?
- Estonia, at 24,452 t against 23,511 t in Norway as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Estonia and Norway?
- 941 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Norway?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Norway rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Estonia ranks 119th and Norway ranks 121st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).