Eswatini vs Fiji: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Eswatini
- Fiji
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 4,760 t against 4,178 t in Eswatini, a difference of 582 t.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 157th and Fiji ranks 156th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Fiji in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,014 t | 1,356 t | 658.89 t | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 3,692 t | 2,608 t | 1,084 t | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 4,302 t | 5,055 t | 752.67 t | Fiji |
| 1990s | 3,437 t | 7,373 t | 3,936 t | Fiji |
| 2000s | 3,067 t | 4,011 t | 943.76 t | Fiji |
| 2010s | 3,352 t | 3,721 t | 369.42 t | Fiji |
| 2020s | 4,420 t | 3,771 t | 648.76 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Eswatini or Fiji?
- Fiji, at 4,760 t against 4,178 t in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Eswatini and Fiji?
- 582 t, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Fiji?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Fiji rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Eswatini ranks 157th and Fiji ranks 156th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).