Ethiopia PDR vs Finland: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Finland
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 64,356 t against 61,124 t in Finland, a difference of 3,232 t.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 88th and Finland ranks 90th of 201 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 51,748 t | 183,710 t | 131,962 t | Finland |
| 1970s | 54,661 t | 189,604 t | 134,943 t | Finland |
| 1980s | 58,134 t | 177,771 t | 119,637 t | Finland |
| 1990s | 63,345 t | 131,446 t | 68,101 t | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Ethiopia PDR or Finland?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 64,356 t against 61,124 t in Finland as of 1992.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Ethiopia PDR and Finland?
- 3,232 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Finland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Finland rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 88th and Finland ranks 90th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).