Ethiopia PDR vs Saudi Arabia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 64,356 t against 60,315 t in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 4,041 t.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 88th and Saudi Arabia ranks 91st of 201 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 51,748 t | 915.99 t | 50,832 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 54,661 t | 2,085 t | 52,576 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 58,134 t | 20,123 t | 38,011 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 63,345 t | 25,302 t | 38,043 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Ethiopia PDR or Saudi Arabia?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 64,356 t against 60,315 t in Saudi Arabia as of 1992.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Ethiopia PDR and Saudi Arabia?
- 4,041 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Saudi Arabia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Saudi Arabia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 88th and Saudi Arabia ranks 91st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).