Ethiopia vs Ireland: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia
- Ireland
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 146,771 t against 146,449 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 322 t.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Ireland has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 51st and Ireland ranks 50th of 201 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 60,416 t | 165,871 t | 105,455 t | Ireland |
| 2000s | 80,683 t | 153,779 t | 73,096 t | Ireland |
| 2010s | 133,146 t | 152,604 t | 19,457 t | Ireland |
| 2020s | 139,046 t | 155,122 t | 16,076 t | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Ethiopia or Ireland?
- Ireland, at 146,771 t against 146,449 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Ethiopia and Ireland?
- 322 t, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Ireland?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Ireland rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia ranks 51st and Ireland ranks 50th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).