Ethiopia vs Uruguay: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 146,449 t against 143,525 t in Uruguay, a difference of 2,924 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 51st and Uruguay ranks 53rd of 201 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 60,416 t | 44,866 t | 15,550 t | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 80,683 t | 43,476 t | 37,206 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 133,146 t | 97,875 t | 35,271 t | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 139,046 t | 135,386 t | 3,659 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Ethiopia or Uruguay?
- Ethiopia, at 146,449 t against 143,525 t in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Ethiopia and Uruguay?
- 2,924 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Uruguay?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Uruguay rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia ranks 51st and Uruguay ranks 53rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).