Europe vs Pakistan: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Europe
- Pakistan
How they compare
Europe currently reports 9.19 million t against 1.11 million t in Pakistan, a difference of 8.09 million t.
That makes Europe's figure about 8.3 times Pakistan's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Europe has been ahead every year.
Europe ranks 6th and Pakistan ranks 8th of 32 groups.
Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16.93 million t | 190,534 t | 16.74 million t | Europe |
| 1970s | 21.96 million t | 243,448 t | 21.72 million t | Europe |
| 1980s | 24.14 million t | 341,543 t | 23.79 million t | Europe |
| 1990s | 15.67 million t | 447,424 t | 15.22 million t | Europe |
| 2000s | 11.04 million t | 587,571 t | 10.45 million t | Europe |
| 2010s | 10.14 million t | 828,594 t | 9.31 million t | Europe |
| 2020s | 9.67 million t | 1.06 million t | 8.61 million t | Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Europe or Pakistan?
- Europe, at 9.19 million t against 1.11 million t in Pakistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Europe and Pakistan?
- 8.09 million t, with Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and Pakistan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Europe and Pakistan rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Europe ranks 6th and Pakistan ranks 8th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).