Fiji vs Jamaica: Input — Cropland potassium

Fiji
4,760 t
in 2023
Jamaica
5,079 t
in 2023
Fiji rank
156th
Jamaica rank
154th

Input — Cropland potassium over time

  • Fiji
  • Jamaica
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 5,079 t against 4,760 t in Fiji, a difference of 319 t.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.

Fiji ranks 156th and Jamaica ranks 154th of 201 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 1,356 t 9,343 t 7,987 t Jamaica
1970s 2,608 t 10,533 t 7,925 t Jamaica
1980s 5,055 t 10,508 t 5,453 t Jamaica
1990s 7,373 t 12,515 t 5,141 t Jamaica
2000s 4,011 t 5,462 t 1,451 t Jamaica
2010s 3,721 t 5,591 t 1,870 t Jamaica
2020s 3,771 t 5,342 t 1,571 t Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Fiji or Jamaica?
Jamaica, at 5,079 t against 4,760 t in Fiji as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Fiji and Jamaica?
319 t, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Jamaica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Fiji and Jamaica rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
Fiji ranks 156th and Jamaica ranks 154th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).