Fiji vs Trinidad and Tobago: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Fiji
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 4,767 t against 4,760 t in Fiji, a difference of 7 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Fiji ranks 156th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 155th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,356 t | 2,899 t | 1,543 t | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1970s | 2,608 t | 3,554 t | 945.56 t | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1980s | 5,055 t | 2,616 t | 2,438 t | Fiji |
| 1990s | 7,373 t | 3,747 t | 3,626 t | Fiji |
| 2000s | 4,011 t | 3,525 t | 486.41 t | Fiji |
| 2010s | 3,721 t | 4,444 t | 722.93 t | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2020s | 3,771 t | 4,648 t | 877.16 t | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Fiji or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 4,767 t against 4,760 t in Fiji as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Fiji and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 7 t, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Fiji and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Fiji ranks 156th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 155th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).