Finland vs Morocco: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Finland
- Morocco
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 67,319 t against 61,124 t in Finland, a difference of 6,195 t.
That makes Morocco's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 90th and Morocco ranks 87th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 5 and Morocco in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 183,710 t | 25,240 t | 158,470 t | Finland |
| 1970s | 189,604 t | 41,423 t | 148,181 t | Finland |
| 1980s | 177,771 t | 58,390 t | 119,381 t | Finland |
| 1990s | 120,135 t | 67,550 t | 52,585 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 92,754 t | 69,085 t | 23,668 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 70,396 t | 74,976 t | 4,580 t | Morocco |
| 2020s | 65,526 t | 82,875 t | 17,349 t | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Finland or Morocco?
- Morocco, at 67,319 t against 61,124 t in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Finland and Morocco?
- 6,195 t, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Morocco?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Morocco rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Finland ranks 90th and Morocco ranks 87th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).