Gabon vs Jordan: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Gabon
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 8,487 t against 7,535 t in Gabon, a difference of 952 t.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Gabon's.
The two have swapped places 20 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.
Gabon ranks 139th and Jordan ranks 137th of 201 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,035 t | 1,607 t | 572.39 t | Jordan |
| 1970s | 1,286 t | 1,440 t | 154.03 t | Jordan |
| 1980s | 1,906 t | 2,342 t | 435.69 t | Jordan |
| 1990s | 2,000 t | 3,390 t | 1,390 t | Jordan |
| 2000s | 3,133 t | 5,533 t | 2,400 t | Jordan |
| 2010s | 4,273 t | 6,705 t | 2,431 t | Jordan |
| 2020s | 6,005 t | 7,297 t | 1,293 t | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Gabon or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 8,487 t against 7,535 t in Gabon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Gabon and Jordan?
- 952 t, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Jordan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Gabon and Jordan rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Gabon ranks 139th and Jordan ranks 137th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).