Georgia vs Jordan: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Georgia
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 8,487 t against 8,075 t in Georgia, a difference of 412 t.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 126th and Jordan ranks 125th of 186 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,797 t | 3,656 t | 6,141 t | Georgia |
| 2000s | 8,935 t | 5,533 t | 3,401 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 7,357 t | 6,705 t | 652.19 t | Georgia |
| 2020s | 8,304 t | 7,297 t | 1,006 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Georgia or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 8,487 t against 8,075 t in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Georgia and Jordan?
- 412 t, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Jordan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Jordan rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Georgia ranks 126th and Jordan ranks 125th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).