Georgia vs Kuwait: Input — Cropland potassium

Georgia
8,075 t
in 2023
Kuwait
8,872 t
in 2023
Georgia rank
138th
Kuwait rank
136th

Input — Cropland potassium over time

  • Georgia
  • Kuwait
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196119922023

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 8,872 t against 8,075 t in Georgia, a difference of 797 t.

That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 138th and Kuwait ranks 136th of 201 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Kuwait Difference Ahead
1990s 9,797 t 904.03 t 8,893 t Georgia
2000s 8,935 t 1,816 t 7,119 t Georgia
2010s 7,357 t 6,207 t 1,150 t Georgia
2020s 8,304 t 8,103 t 200.94 t Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Georgia or Kuwait?
Kuwait, at 8,872 t against 8,075 t in Georgia as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Georgia and Kuwait?
797 t, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Kuwait?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Kuwait rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
Georgia ranks 138th and Kuwait ranks 136th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).