Ghana vs Latvia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Ghana
- Latvia
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 42,275 t against 40,078 t in Latvia, a difference of 2,197 t.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Ghana ranks 99th and Latvia ranks 101st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,455 t | 65,156 t | 54,700 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 28,521 t | 35,720 t | 7,198 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 46,589 t | 43,296 t | 3,292 t | Ghana |
| 2020s | 54,692 t | 45,868 t | 8,824 t | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Ghana or Latvia?
- Ghana, at 42,275 t against 40,078 t in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Ghana and Latvia?
- 2,197 t, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ghana and Latvia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Ghana ranks 99th and Latvia ranks 101st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).