Guadeloupe vs Singapore: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Guadeloupe
- Singapore
How they compare
Guadeloupe currently reports 358.12 t against 339.15 t in Singapore, a difference of 18.97 t.
That makes Guadeloupe's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guadeloupe ahead.
Guadeloupe ranks 169th and Singapore ranks 170th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guadeloupe averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guadeloupe | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,373 t | 3,502 t | 870.2 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1970s | 3,323 t | 4,202 t | 879.28 t | Singapore |
| 1980s | 2,944 t | 3,929 t | 984.81 t | Singapore |
| 1990s | 2,951 t | 1,433 t | 1,518 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2000s | 1,283 t | 395.95 t | 887.3 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2010s | 300.62 t | 368.68 t | 68.07 t | Singapore |
| 2020s | 347.97 t | 349.34 t | 1.36 t | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Guadeloupe or Singapore?
- Guadeloupe, at 358.12 t against 339.15 t in Singapore as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Guadeloupe and Singapore?
- 18.97 t, with Guadeloupe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guadeloupe and Singapore?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guadeloupe and Singapore rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Guadeloupe ranks 169th and Singapore ranks 170th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).