Guatemala vs Uruguay: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Guatemala
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 143,525 t against 127,070 t in Guatemala, a difference of 16,455 t.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.
Guatemala ranks 54th and Uruguay ranks 53rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 6 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 20,795 t | 32,500 t | 11,705 t | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 34,368 t | 31,518 t | 2,850 t | Guatemala |
| 1980s | 37,332 t | 36,239 t | 1,093 t | Guatemala |
| 1990s | 55,430 t | 42,408 t | 13,022 t | Guatemala |
| 2000s | 75,949 t | 43,476 t | 32,472 t | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 123,555 t | 97,875 t | 25,680 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 138,544 t | 135,386 t | 3,157 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Guatemala or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 143,525 t against 127,070 t in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Guatemala and Uruguay?
- 16,455 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Uruguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Uruguay rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Guatemala ranks 54th and Uruguay ranks 53rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).