Guinea-Bissau vs Luxembourg: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 6,593 t against 6,297 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 296 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 145th and Luxembourg ranks 148th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,356 t | 6,665 t | 2,309 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 6,136 t | 6,496 t | 359.84 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 6,685 t | 6,327 t | 357.82 t | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Guinea-Bissau or Luxembourg?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 6,593 t against 6,297 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Guinea-Bissau and Luxembourg?
- 296 t, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Luxembourg rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 145th and Luxembourg ranks 148th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).