Guinea-Bissau vs Montenegro: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Montenegro
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 6,593 t against 6,323 t in Montenegro, a difference of 270 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 145th and Montenegro ranks 147th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,364 t | 9,236 t | 4,872 t | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 6,136 t | 7,677 t | 1,541 t | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 6,685 t | 6,516 t | 168.28 t | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Guinea-Bissau or Montenegro?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 6,593 t against 6,323 t in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Guinea-Bissau and Montenegro?
- 270 t, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Montenegro rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 145th and Montenegro ranks 147th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).