Guyana vs Montenegro: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Guyana
- Montenegro
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 6,639 t against 6,323 t in Montenegro, a difference of 316 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Guyana ranks 144th and Montenegro ranks 147th of 201 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,792 t | 9,236 t | 5,444 t | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 5,345 t | 7,677 t | 2,332 t | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 6,433 t | 6,516 t | 82.77 t | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Guyana or Montenegro?
- Guyana, at 6,639 t against 6,323 t in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Guyana and Montenegro?
- 316 t, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Montenegro rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Guyana ranks 144th and Montenegro ranks 147th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).