Guyana vs Namibia: Input — Cropland potassium

Guyana
6,639 t
in 2023
Namibia
6,796 t
in 2023
Guyana rank
144th
Namibia rank
143rd

Input — Cropland potassium over time

  • Guyana
  • Namibia
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 6,796 t against 6,639 t in Guyana, a difference of 157 t.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Guyana ranks 144th and Namibia ranks 143rd of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 3,718 t 4,404 t 686.03 t Namibia
1970s 3,989 t 4,425 t 436.2 t Namibia
1980s 2,620 t 3,963 t 1,343 t Namibia
1990s 2,879 t 4,215 t 1,336 t Namibia
2000s 3,378 t 5,001 t 1,622 t Namibia
2010s 5,345 t 5,737 t 392.44 t Namibia
2020s 6,433 t 5,878 t 555.25 t Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Guyana or Namibia?
Namibia, at 6,796 t against 6,639 t in Guyana as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Guyana and Namibia?
157 t, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guyana and Namibia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
Guyana ranks 144th and Namibia ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).