Haiti vs Rwanda: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Haiti
- Rwanda
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 21,640 t against 16,693 t in Rwanda, a difference of 4,947 t.
That makes Haiti's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Haiti ahead.
Haiti ranks 114th and Rwanda ranks 117th of 186 countries.
Haiti has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16,793 t | 2,039 t | 14,754 t | Haiti |
| 1970s | 20,623 t | 2,706 t | 17,917 t | Haiti |
| 1980s | 12,764 t | 3,543 t | 9,221 t | Haiti |
| 1990s | 14,326 t | 3,845 t | 10,481 t | Haiti |
| 2000s | 20,924 t | 8,228 t | 12,696 t | Haiti |
| 2010s | 32,005 t | 16,438 t | 15,568 t | Haiti |
| 2020s | 22,593 t | 18,853 t | 3,740 t | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Haiti or Rwanda?
- Haiti, at 21,640 t against 16,693 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Haiti and Rwanda?
- 4,947 t, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Rwanda rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Haiti ranks 114th and Rwanda ranks 117th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).