Honduras vs Nepal: Input — Cropland potassium

Honduras
79,738 t
in 2023
Nepal
79,929 t
in 2023
Honduras rank
77th
Nepal rank
76th

Input — Cropland potassium over time

  • Honduras
  • Nepal
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 79,929 t against 79,738 t in Honduras, a difference of 191 t.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.

Honduras ranks 77th and Nepal ranks 76th of 201 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 22,797 t 38,991 t 16,195 t Nepal
1970s 29,329 t 50,434 t 21,105 t Nepal
1980s 30,288 t 64,450 t 34,162 t Nepal
1990s 34,312 t 73,376 t 39,063 t Nepal
2000s 40,215 t 86,762 t 46,547 t Nepal
2010s 68,206 t 106,746 t 38,540 t Nepal
2020s 81,109 t 108,470 t 27,361 t Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Honduras or Nepal?
Nepal, at 79,929 t against 79,738 t in Honduras as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Honduras and Nepal?
191 t, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Honduras and Nepal rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
Honduras ranks 77th and Nepal ranks 76th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).