Hungary vs Malawi: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Hungary
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 105,159 t against 103,997 t in Hungary, a difference of 1,162 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 63rd and Malawi ranks 61st of 201 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 233,872 t | 4,977 t | 228,896 t | Hungary |
| 1970s | 521,275 t | 7,575 t | 513,700 t | Hungary |
| 1980s | 546,896 t | 10,730 t | 536,166 t | Hungary |
| 1990s | 159,852 t | 11,475 t | 148,377 t | Hungary |
| 2000s | 135,850 t | 19,818 t | 116,032 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 134,195 t | 50,317 t | 83,878 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 133,282 t | 97,614 t | 35,668 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Hungary or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 105,159 t against 103,997 t in Hungary as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Hungary and Malawi?
- 1,162 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Malawi?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Malawi rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Hungary ranks 63rd and Malawi ranks 61st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).