Hungary vs Sudan: Input — Cropland potassium

Hungary
103,997 t
in 2023
Sudan
98,751 t
in 2023
Hungary rank
63rd
Sudan rank
65th

Input — Cropland potassium over time

  • Hungary
  • Sudan
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 103,997 t against 98,751 t in Sudan, a difference of 5,246 t.

That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.

Hungary ranks 63rd and Sudan ranks 65th of 201 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 138,895 t 99,334 t 39,561 t Hungary
2020s 133,282 t 99,117 t 34,165 t Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Hungary or Sudan?
Hungary, at 103,997 t against 98,751 t in Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Hungary and Sudan?
5,246 t, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Sudan rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
Hungary ranks 63rd and Sudan ranks 65th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).