Indonesia vs Pakistan: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Indonesia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 2.15 million t against 1.11 million t in Pakistan, a difference of 1.04 million t.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.9 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 6th and Pakistan ranks 8th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 6 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 227,038 t | 190,534 t | 36,504 t | Indonesia |
| 1970s | 241,238 t | 243,448 t | 2,209 t | Pakistan |
| 1980s | 430,053 t | 341,543 t | 88,510 t | Indonesia |
| 1990s | 625,474 t | 447,424 t | 178,050 t | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 931,947 t | 587,571 t | 344,375 t | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 1.94 million t | 828,594 t | 1.11 million t | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 2.33 million t | 1.06 million t | 1.27 million t | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Indonesia or Pakistan?
- Indonesia, at 2.15 million t against 1.11 million t in Pakistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Indonesia and Pakistan?
- 1.04 million t, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Pakistan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Indonesia and Pakistan rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Indonesia ranks 6th and Pakistan ranks 8th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).