Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Japan: Input β Cropland potassium
Input β Cropland potassium over time
- Iran (Islamic Republic of)
- Japan
How they compare
Iran (Islamic Republic of) currently reports 258,319 t against 258,192 t in Japan, a difference of 127 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.
Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 34th and Japan ranks 35th of 201 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran (Islamic Republic of) | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 98,600 t | 554,441 t | 455,841 t | Japan |
| 1970s | 108,318 t | 614,386 t | 506,068 t | Japan |
| 1980s | 137,536 t | 600,424 t | 462,888 t | Japan |
| 1990s | 200,522 t | 509,016 t | 308,494 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 295,044 t | 408,076 t | 113,032 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 229,374 t | 344,043 t | 114,669 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 253,565 t | 283,855 t | 30,290 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input β cropland potassium, Iran (Islamic Republic of) or Japan?
- Iran (Islamic Republic of), at 258,319 t against 258,192 t in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input β cropland potassium between Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Japan?
- 127 t, with Iran (Islamic Republic of) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Japan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Japan rank globally for input β cropland potassium?
- Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 34th and Japan ranks 35th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).