Israel vs Zimbabwe: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Israel
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 35,617 t against 33,037 t in Israel, a difference of 2,580 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Israel ranks 109th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,737 t | 23,860 t | 18,123 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 16,733 t | 36,008 t | 19,276 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 23,808 t | 37,532 t | 13,724 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 31,609 t | 42,030 t | 10,421 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 31,420 t | 29,214 t | 2,207 t | Israel |
| 2010s | 29,966 t | 36,474 t | 6,508 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 33,065 t | 36,494 t | 3,429 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Israel or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 35,617 t against 33,037 t in Israel as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Israel and Zimbabwe?
- 2,580 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Israel and Zimbabwe rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Israel ranks 109th and Zimbabwe ranks 106th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).