Italy vs Mexico: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Italy
- Mexico
How they compare
Italy currently reports 502,884 t against 486,726 t in Mexico, a difference of 16,158 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 22nd and Mexico ranks 24th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 6 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 727,383 t | 147,639 t | 579,744 t | Italy |
| 1970s | 818,781 t | 222,411 t | 596,370 t | Italy |
| 1980s | 923,666 t | 311,760 t | 611,905 t | Italy |
| 1990s | 838,405 t | 322,130 t | 516,276 t | Italy |
| 2000s | 672,642 t | 419,396 t | 253,246 t | Italy |
| 2010s | 527,236 t | 492,167 t | 35,069 t | Italy |
| 2020s | 511,806 t | 531,668 t | 19,862 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Italy or Mexico?
- Italy, at 502,884 t against 486,726 t in Mexico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Italy and Mexico?
- 16,158 t, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Mexico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Italy and Mexico rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Italy ranks 22nd and Mexico ranks 24th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).