Italy vs Yugoslav SFR: Input — Cropland potassium

Italy
502,884 t
in 2023
Yugoslav SFR
523,039 t
in 1991
Italy rank
22nd
Yugoslav SFR rank
20th

Input — Cropland potassium over time

  • Italy
  • Yugoslav SFR
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

Yugoslav SFR currently reports 523,039 t against 502,884 t in Italy, a difference of 20,155 t.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.

Italy ranks 22nd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 20th of 201 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Yugoslav SFR Difference Ahead
1960s 727,383 t 498,550 t 228,833 t Italy
1970s 818,781 t 585,905 t 232,876 t Italy
1980s 923,666 t 657,038 t 266,628 t Italy
1990s 897,158 t 547,428 t 349,730 t Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Italy or Yugoslav SFR?
Yugoslav SFR, at 523,039 t against 502,884 t in Italy as of 1991.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Italy and Yugoslav SFR?
20,155 t, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Yugoslav SFR?
31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
How do Italy and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
Italy ranks 22nd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 20th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).