Kazakhstan vs Republic of Korea: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Kazakhstan
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 223,797 t against 198,557 t in Republic of Korea, a difference of 25,240 t.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Republic of Korea's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 35th and Republic of Korea ranks 38th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Republic of Korea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 278,951 t | 293,269 t | 14,318 t | Republic of Korea |
| 2000s | 200,510 t | 222,523 t | 22,013 t | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 238,080 t | 214,626 t | 23,455 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 221,793 t | 202,860 t | 18,934 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Kazakhstan or Republic of Korea?
- Kazakhstan, at 223,797 t against 198,557 t in Republic of Korea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Kazakhstan and Republic of Korea?
- 25,240 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Republic of Korea?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Republic of Korea rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Kazakhstan ranks 35th and Republic of Korea ranks 38th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).