Kenya vs Turkmenistan: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Kenya
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 124,353 t against 123,976 t in Kenya, a difference of 377 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 56th and Turkmenistan ranks 55th of 201 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 53,612 t | 58,330 t | 4,717 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 60,318 t | 101,569 t | 41,251 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 86,269 t | 113,174 t | 26,905 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 102,457 t | 125,053 t | 22,596 t | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Kenya or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 124,353 t against 123,976 t in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Kenya and Turkmenistan?
- 377 t, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Turkmenistan rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Kenya ranks 56th and Turkmenistan ranks 55th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).