Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Sudan: Input β Cropland potassium
Input β Cropland potassium over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Sudan
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 104,327 t against 98,751 t in Sudan, a difference of 5,576 t.
That makes Lao People's Democratic Republic's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 62nd and Sudan ranks 65th of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lao People's Democratic Republic averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 82,024 t | 99,334 t | 17,310 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 105,330 t | 99,117 t | 6,213 t | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input β cropland potassium, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Sudan?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 104,327 t against 98,751 t in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input β cropland potassium between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Sudan?
- 5,576 t, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Sudan rank globally for input β cropland potassium?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 62nd and Sudan ranks 65th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).