Latvia vs Sri Lanka: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Latvia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 47,452 t against 40,078 t in Latvia, a difference of 7,374 t.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 101st and Sri Lanka ranks 98th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 65,156 t | 64,565 t | 590.47 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 35,720 t | 64,125 t | 28,406 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 43,296 t | 68,505 t | 25,209 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 45,868 t | 73,018 t | 27,150 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Latvia or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 47,452 t against 40,078 t in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Latvia and Sri Lanka?
- 7,374 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sri Lanka?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Sri Lanka rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Latvia ranks 101st and Sri Lanka ranks 98th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).