Lebanon vs Luxembourg: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Lebanon
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 6,512 t against 6,297 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 215 t.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.
Lebanon ranks 146th and Luxembourg ranks 148th of 201 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,645 t | 6,665 t | 1,980 t | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 9,666 t | 6,496 t | 3,170 t | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 6,738 t | 6,327 t | 411.72 t | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Lebanon or Luxembourg?
- Lebanon, at 6,512 t against 6,297 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Lebanon and Luxembourg?
- 215 t, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Lebanon and Luxembourg rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Lebanon ranks 146th and Luxembourg ranks 148th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).