Lesotho vs Vanuatu: Input — Cropland potassium

Lesotho
2,349 t
in 2023
Vanuatu
2,450 t
in 2023
Lesotho rank
165th
Vanuatu rank
164th

Input — Cropland potassium over time

  • Lesotho
  • Vanuatu
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119922023

How they compare

Vanuatu currently reports 2,450 t against 2,349 t in Lesotho, a difference of 101 t.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.

Lesotho ranks 165th and Vanuatu ranks 164th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 6 and Vanuatu in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Vanuatu Difference Ahead
1960s 1,930 t 820.27 t 1,110 t Lesotho
1970s 2,293 t 1,143 t 1,149 t Lesotho
1980s 2,350 t 1,262 t 1,088 t Lesotho
1990s 3,378 t 1,488 t 1,890 t Lesotho
2000s 3,529 t 1,792 t 1,737 t Lesotho
2010s 2,679 t 2,596 t 83.76 t Lesotho
2020s 2,214 t 2,224 t 10.39 t Vanuatu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Lesotho or Vanuatu?
Vanuatu, at 2,450 t against 2,349 t in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Lesotho and Vanuatu?
101 t, with Vanuatu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Vanuatu?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Vanuatu rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
Lesotho ranks 165th and Vanuatu ranks 164th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).