Liberia vs Qatar: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Liberia
- Qatar
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 4,137 t against 3,864 t in Qatar, a difference of 273 t.
That makes Liberia's figure about 1.1 times Qatar's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Liberia ahead.
Liberia ranks 158th and Qatar ranks 161st of 201 countries.
Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,002 t | 97.94 t | 904.41 t | Liberia |
| 1970s | 1,571 t | 110.28 t | 1,460 t | Liberia |
| 1980s | 2,082 t | 176.44 t | 1,905 t | Liberia |
| 1990s | 1,555 t | 408.26 t | 1,147 t | Liberia |
| 2000s | 2,306 t | 924.44 t | 1,382 t | Liberia |
| 2010s | 3,950 t | 2,119 t | 1,831 t | Liberia |
| 2020s | 4,305 t | 3,539 t | 766.84 t | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Liberia or Qatar?
- Liberia, at 4,137 t against 3,864 t in Qatar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Liberia and Qatar?
- 273 t, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Qatar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Liberia and Qatar rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Liberia ranks 158th and Qatar ranks 161st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).