Libya vs Namibia: Input — Cropland potassium

Libya
6,862 t
in 2023
Namibia
6,796 t
in 2023
Libya rank
142nd
Namibia rank
143rd

Input — Cropland potassium over time

  • Libya
  • Namibia
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 6,862 t against 6,796 t in Namibia, a difference of 66 t.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Libya ranks 142nd and Namibia ranks 143rd of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 5 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 2,053 t 4,404 t 2,352 t Namibia
1970s 3,649 t 4,425 t 776.42 t Namibia
1980s 4,618 t 3,963 t 655.17 t Libya
1990s 6,451 t 4,215 t 2,236 t Libya
2000s 6,756 t 5,001 t 1,755 t Libya
2010s 6,105 t 5,737 t 367.76 t Libya
2020s 6,292 t 5,878 t 413.68 t Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Libya or Namibia?
Libya, at 6,862 t against 6,796 t in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Libya and Namibia?
66 t, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Libya and Namibia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
Libya ranks 142nd and Namibia ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).