Lithuania vs South Sudan: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Lithuania
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 70,564 t against 68,426 t in Lithuania, a difference of 2,138 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 85th and South Sudan ranks 82nd of 201 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 79,678 t | 62,507 t | 17,171 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 73,180 t | 69,159 t | 4,021 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Lithuania or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 70,564 t against 68,426 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Lithuania and South Sudan?
- 2,138 t, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and South Sudan rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Lithuania ranks 85th and South Sudan ranks 82nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).